Category Archives: General

Three Little Pigs, One Wolf, One Giant and One Gospel

Can you remember The Three Little Pigs? What happens when the first two houses get blown down? The pigs get eaten, right? Not likely, they actually run to their older brother’s house and they all live happily ever after in the brick house at the end, or so I read.bbff

Let’s try again… what about Little Red Riding Hood? Do you remember the bit when the grandmother escapes the wolf by hiding in a cupboard, or the bit when the wolf sees the woodcutter, runs away from the woodcutter, leaving little red unharmed, and never comes back? Me neither…

Okay, one last attempt… Jack and the Beanstalk. What does the giant shout? “Fee, Fi, Foo, Fum! I smell the blood of an Englishman, be he alive or be he dead, I’ll grind his bones to make my bread”, am I right? Well, apparently, he now stops at “Englishman”…

Now for something more serious. Do you remember the bit in the Bible where Jesus is born, starts healing the sick and teaching, and then the book ends? No, me neither… I’m fairly sure there’s something else that should come between miracles and the end, at least something to do with a cross and an empty tomb?

Perhaps you’ve guessed by now that all of these rather strange accounts can be found on the shelves of my home – some in multiple editions. And that includes the children’s “Bible” that fails to reach the cross, let alone the resurrection. However, they all have something in common – and that is an assumption that children must not be confronted with death. But are they right? Should we remove death from the stories our children hear, and cut out the crucifixion from the Bible until they are older?

These questions came to mind today, following a conversation with one of my children on the way back from school. It ran something like this:

“Dad, look, a wedding car!”
“I’m not sure it is, it looks more like a funeral car” (spying the black car with dark rosettes)
“What’s a funeral dad?”
“What do we do when people die?”
“We celebrate”
“Well, that’s a funeral. Is a celebration normally happy, or sad?”
“Happy”
“So, why would we celebrate at a funeral, isn’t it sad if someone dies?”
“We know that they are going to heaven, we can celebrate”
“Are you sure, what if they have done bad things, are you sure they will go to heaven?”
“But it says in the Bible, that Jesus died for our sins” (good lad!)

We went on to talk about other related things, but it struck me later in the evening, reading the strange version of Little Red Riding Hood mentioned above, that my son’s understanding of the Gospel relies on his knowledge of death. But not only this… it is the same Gospel built upon death that has changed his understanding of death itself, and given him a reason for hope.

And I don’t think any age sensitivity should justify hiding that from anyone.

True, Jesus was brutally flogged and died on a bloody cross. True, it’s so horrific that when Mel Gibson made a film of it, the board gave it an 18 certificate. But it is also true that on that tree Christ died for our sins, that whoever believes in him would not perish, but have eternal life. And – knowing this – I believe that I’d be a bad father if I didn’t try my very best to teach that to my children.

By faith was Abel’s off’ring wrought [new hymn]

A new hymn to an old tune… this is a ‘work in progress’; please do give your feedback. It is a reflection on Hebrews 11:1-12:2.

By faith was Abel’s off’ring wrought,
By faith was Enoch heav’nward brought,
By faith Noah kept his family safe,
Was heir to righteousness by faith.

By faith did Abraham leave his home,
By faith he offered up his son.
By faith had Jacob spoke afore,
And future Exodus foresaw.

By faith was Moses kept alive,
By faith he for his people strived.
By faith sought the reproach of Christ,
Disdained Egyptian royal life.

By faith did many likewise walk,
By faith were mocked and stoned and killed.
By faith they took adversity,
Of whom the world was not worthy.

Through faith all these commended are,
Yet saw the promise from afar;
For God had purposed better still,
Which God in Christ for us fulfilled.

By faith Christ once endured the cross,
By faith he sought his joy in us,
By faith he had the shame despised,
And now he reigns above the skies.

Therefore since we are not alone,
But walk the path that they have shown,
Look now to Christ as on we race,
Founder, perfecter, of our faith.

Music:- [Puer Nobis Nascitur; by M. Praetorius; AMR 512]
Words:- Vincent Murphy 2012

On styles of worship

Whether your traditions be old or new,
they can’t be the centre of worship.
It shouldn’t make-or-break faith for you,
although you may still prefer it.

Your God isn’t the God of the Bible,
if your theology requires your culture.
For God’s word is ever applicable;
to the past, the present, and future.

Be careful about what means you use,
not everything is truly neutral.
Don’t gather for an experience,
but to grow by all that’s truthful.

If it’s used to shape your emotions,
doing so apart from God’s living truth,
it’s replaced God in your devotions,
and become an idol under his roof.

At the end of first John we read just this:
“Little children, keep yourselves from idols;”
Don’t put your brother’s faith at risk;
Seek God, not by style, but by Bible.

What would you like to read?

Dear Readers;

It’s your turn to have your say – what would you like to read more of at this blog? Drop your comments below and I’ll keep them in mind!

Thanks;

Vincent

Halloween Bible Quotations

Resist the devil

Christian Blogs are awash with discussion of Halloween today… but many of them lack reference to scripture. Here are a few suggestions to get you thinking…

Behold! I tell you a mystery. We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed. For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written:“Death is swallowed up in victory.”
“O death, where is your victory?O death, where is your sting?” The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
1 Corinthians 15:51-57

You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. Or do you suppose it is to no purpose that the Scripture says, “He yearns jealously over the spirit that he has made to dwell in us”?
James 4:4-5

Like a madman who throws firebrands, arrows, and death is the man who deceives his neighborand says, “I am only joking!”Proverbs 26:18-19

Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you, Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded. Be wretched and mourn and weep. Let your laughter be turned to mourning and your joy to gloom. Humble yourselves before the Lord, and he will exalt you. James 4:7-10

Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery.
Hebrews 2:14-15

Therefore do not be ashamed of the testimony about our Lord, nor of me his prisoner, but share in suffering for the gospel by the power of God, who saved us and called us to a holy calling, not because of our works but because of his own purpose and grace, which he gave us in Christ Jesus before the ages began, and which now has been manifested through the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel
2 Timothy 1:8-10

For at one time you were darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light (for the fruit of light is found in all that is good and right and true), and try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord. Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them
Ephesians 5:8-11

Do you have some scripture which has relevance to Halloween to share, or comments on those already listed? Add a comment below or drop me a message with the verse to add.

The Reality of Evangelism

Can you count the people?

Whether marriage already contracted should be governed by the obligation of a pre-nuptial contract?

Objection 1: It would seem that a marriage already contracted ought to be governed by a pre-nuptial contract. For the second contract does not replace the first but adds to it (Galatians 3:17). Now, the pre-nuptial contract comes before the marriage contract, since it is pre-nuptial. Therefore the obligation of the pre-nuptial contract governs the marriage.

Objection 2: An impediment disclosed and accepted by all parties at the forming of a contract cannot be contradicted by such a contract. For the contract is made freely in the light of the impediment and the plain intention is therefore to be compliant thereunto. The pre-nuptial contract has all parties in common with the marriage contract and comes before it. Therefore the obligation of the pre-nuptial contract governs the marriage.

Objection 3: The state of a man before marriage is the same as that following divorce. A man is only prevented from the division of assets with his wife for so long as they are joined. Therefore the contract formerly in force becomes again in force.

I answer that, A thing ceases to be in the power of a man from the fact that it passes into the power of another. Now, a pre-nuptial contract is in the power and possession of a man and a woman before they are wed. A man and a woman when joined in marriage are, by the work of God, no longer two but are one flesh (Matthew 19:6). Therefore the contract, its assets, and its interest pass into the power and possession of the married couple equal such that all benefits which would accrue to one party are now the possession of the couple. If it states a distribution of seven-tenths to the man and three-tens to the woman, when the two are joined as one flesh then the future asset of seven-tenths of the man and three-tens of the woman become aggregated as a promise of the whole to the one flesh. Thus, in the case of divorcement, the division is to be made in accordance to the act of the power of God in conjoining the two as one. No contract in any form whatsoever may override this for the act of joining man and wife is in the power of God and not of man.

Answer to Objection 1: The pre-nuptial contract establishes a future interest which in itself is an asset. These assets become property in common with the conjoining and so even if it is held that the contract survives yet the future interests named in the contract are no longer individual but in common to the one joined couple. Further, if it be insisted that the assets of the contract do not become common (which is by no means the case), it shall be argued: that no contract of marriage is valid if it be entered into illegally; that it is illegal to enter into a marriage without full intention to remain within it for the time the two parties remain alive; that a prenuptial agreement which does not become a common asset provides deliberately for a state of divorcement; thus that the marriage so entered into is invalid.

Answer to Objection 2: The parties of the pre-nuptial contract are not the same as the parties of the marriage. In the pre-nuptial contract are two parties; man and woman. In the marriage are three parties; man, woman and God. Thus, unless it be disclosed to God that such an impediment exists to which God has issued a dispensation exempting the couple from some part of his institution of marriage, then no impediment may be said to imply compliance.

Answer to Objection 3: A man may be set apart from his wife by divorcement but his state does not return to that which was previous to his marriage. For it is forbidden by the law of God to effect the full severance of the marriage bond (Matthew 19:6); also, for the obligation of man to his wife does not cease with divorcement (Matthew 19:9); also, for the two who were joined as one flesh even if separated remain two separated parts of one flesh and thus not the same parties as the two who were formerly joined as one flesh. Thus, the state of the latter is not the same as the former; nor is the identity of the latter the same as the former.

The Lord our Righteousness

Having this verse (Jeremiah 23:6) in mind this morning I came across this brilliant piece of writing from the late J. C. Ryle, formerly Bishop of Liverpool.

“This is His name whereby He shall be called—the Lord our Righteousness.” Jeremiah 23:6.

The time is short. It is but a little while, and the Lord Jesus shall come in His glory. The judgment shall be set and the books shall be opened. “Before Him shall be gathered all nations,” “that everyone may receive the things done in his body, according to that he has done, whether it be good or bad.” The inmost secrets of all hearts shall be revealed; “and the kings of the earth, the nobles, the military commanders, the rich, the powerful, and every slave and free person,” will stand together on a level at the judgment, and will see each other face to face, and one by one will have to give account of themselves to God before the whole world. Thus it is written, and therefore it is true and sure to come to pass.

And what does each of you intend to say in that hour? What is the defense you are prepared to set up? What is the answer you propose to give? What is the cause you mean to show why sentence should not be pronounced against you? Read on…

The Emerging Church [D A Carson; Audio]

What is the emerging church? Is it a conversation, or a movement? What differentiates it from other Christian groups? Here, Dr. Carson discusses the nature and the epistemology of the emerging church in a very balanced way. Overall, he points to much which can be learnt from the emerging church, and many motivations which should be respected, as well as discussing some of they ways in which in some manifestations the results may be less than desirable.

Of particular value here is the discussion of the nature of truth, how concepts of truth differ between social and generational groups, and the way in which these changes affect the reception of various ways in which Christianity is presented.

The Emerging Church – D A Carson [Part 1]
The Emerging Church – D A Carson [Part 2]

My main concern here is that what a church does to attract new members must continue to be done to retain them. In particular, if the propositional truth of scripture is downgraded to a topic of discussion and personal discernment, then whilst it will attract many who find such an approach more comfortable it does not allow for an eventual return to propositional truth. If we suggest that everything is up for debate, then we will never be able to return proper authority to the word without alienating much of the membership.

Richard Hooker’s law of reason

Richard Hooker has an ‘interesting’ argument. The fact that the nature of God limits the actions which God can do without changing his ‘core’ nature he calls the eternal law; and from this he derives natural law that governs ‘natural agents’, celestial law which governs the angels, and reason which he holds to be the expression of divine law to man. From this he seeks to show that reason is a law from God but apart from scripture and that through the exercise of reason we discern the will of God in the form of a law beyond and before scripture.

My concern about this argument is first that ‘reason’ unlike his ‘celestial’ and ‘natural’ forms is not compulsive or regulative but merely supportive. The sun cannot decide against rising, yet man can decide against reason. Whilst it is true that man is governed by some part of the eternal law of God, that law is expressed foremost in those things which we cannot avoid – in our post-fall condition that means to be born, to perceive God in the witness of the creation, to be sinful, to receive such grace as is given, to suffer death, and to receive judgement.

That reason is not a distillate of eternal law should be further clear by considering the chief end of reason, which is sin. For, every man that sins has reasoned that “there is no God” or “God shall not Judge me”, for else he would not sin. He reasons that God is not God indeed, but merely a powerful adversary, thus reasoning he exchanges the truth of God for a lie so that he might continue to sin. So, the chief end of reason is sin, notably idolatry and blasphemy. Reason recieves early attention in the scriptures, indeed it was through a call to reason by the serpent that mankind fell; God had declared the truth apart from reason, and the reason of man through the prompting of the devil made him judge the Word of God as less than certain.

If reason leads inevitably to sin and death, having done so throughout the scriptures from even the earliest times, then can we truly judge reason to be an expression of God’s eternal law as given to the governing of mankind? Long history – whether Jewish, Christian or Pagan – demonstrates that reason reliably leads peoples away from God. Reason is raised up against faith, for the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith. God has revealed to every man his eternal power and divine nature; yet as the scripture shows, our reasoning is futile and our foolish hearts become darkened, for despite claiming to be wise we become fools, exchanging that truth God revealed apart from reason for a lie derived through reason.

It is true that we may, at times, obtain through our industry some useful rules and regulations, and even be able to discern which path is more in agreement with the will of God. Yet, our ability to determine and discern such things results not from reason, but from the grace of God. Was it not declared by God that every thought of the heart of man was only evil continually? How then can we attribute any good thought or righteous judgement to ourselves? Indeed, it is telling that Paul tells of the fate of us sinners apart from grace, that where God ceases to restrain us we fall straightway into dishonourable passions and in depravity commit the most grieveous of sins. What Hooker percieves as the law of reason is perhaps then not law or reason but rather grace, and that it be called law is to be greatly regretted.

Why should this matter? Well, it all comes down to the Gospel. Just consider the simple but glorious truth – that Christ died for our sins and rose again. There is nothing complex about that statement, there is yet nothing in the grammar or syntax that would confuse a child. But, the Gospel is so strange to reason and in opposition to our fallen and self-centered thoughts, that it is impossible for mortal man to arrive at the Gospel through reason. Further, the evil heart of man will rather at every turn seek to use every tool it can to defeat the Gospel, and amongst the tools available the foremost is reason. The moment the seed of the Gospel is sown then sin attacks it from every angle, reasoning that it cannot mean what it means, that it cannot be true, that even if true it is inconvenient. Given this great assault, to which the scriptures testify amply, how ridiculous it is to raise up the proceeds of reason to being a law from God before and apart from scripture?

No, let us be very clear, that the righteous live by faith. It is not through reason that the Gospel can enter the heart, but by grace. It is not by reason then that we are saved, but it is reason that opposes our very salvation. Hooker’s reason itself is unreasonable by his own definition; for because it steadfastly resists the Gospel, so too does it resist God. As it resists God, it cannot be an expression of God’s eternal law in any form without God thereby being the author of evil and so not God at all.

What do you think? Is reason in itself a form of the eternal law of God as given man for his governing, or can the knowledge of God or his law only come from reason only in so much as it is moved through divine grace, a divine grace which we know can work quite apart from reason?